Here is the special edition of tradecarview's newsletter.

To contact us Click HERE

Now you can purchase our recommended high quality vehicles directly from Japan and other countries at reasonable price!! Hurry up to order your dream vehicles NOW!


*Please note that the price is FOB price (excluded shipping cost) and ask the seller for CIF price (included freight and insurance) by clicking CLICK TO ORDER button just after you click the picture on our newsletter

US$5,857 1999 Toyota Altezza	US$12,800 1995 Toyota Supra	US$2,083 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero	US$2,200 2000 BMW 3 Series
US$19,393 2002 Land Rover Range Rover	US$12,105 2001 Honda Integra	US$1,106 1997 Toyota Townace Noah	US$3,892 1997 Land Rover Discovery
US$1,835 1998 Toyota Cresta	US$23,168 1999 Honda S2000	US$9,620 2005 Honda CR-V	US$5,727 2004 Nissan Serena
US$1,197 1999 Toyota Corolla Spacio	US$12,566 2002 Toyota Corolla FX	US$6,508 1992 Nissan Skyline GT-R	US$2,000 1999 Toyota Caldina Van

Motorhead: Button and Vettel's role reversal

To contact us Click HERE

(EUROSPORT) Action,overtaking, talking points – it might be a new season, but the Australian GrandPrix made it feel like Formula One has never been away.
On paper,too, it all looked rather similar to last year, with the top five drivers inlast year’s championship finishing in the top five places in Melbourne.

But subtleshifts in the pecking order at Albert Park point to a complex and exciting 2012championship, which may take considerably longer to decide than SebastianVettel’s one-man show did last year.
In fact, itlooks as if the defending champion has swapped roles with Jenson Button forthis year’s campaign, judging by the way the race played out.
The Britwas the new Vettel, getting out in front, controlling the race from the head ofthe field, and making driving look as easy as a Michelin-starred chef wouldcooking up beans on toast.
The German,by contrast, was the new Button, turning an unspectacular qualifying positioninto a very creditable second place with good strategy, enterprise andopportunism.
On racepace there was, on the face of it, little to separate Red Bull and McLaren. ButMcLaren had demonstrated their raw speed advantage in qualifying, and even ifit turns out on future weekends that the two cars are well-matched on racedays, getting out in front will be nine-tenths of the battle for McLaren. It’sone thing to set similar lap times, but it’s another altogether, even in theera of DRS and KERS, to be overtaking.
Button wasunderstandably delighted with the 13th race win of his career. “The car isbeautiful,” he told his race engineer as he coasted home on his lap of honour,“And she is quick.”
Indeed,Button’s McLaren was a sight to behold, responding to his every command like afaithful hound.
Comparethat with Fernando Alonso,who was driving a dog of a Ferrari.
There’ssomething about Alonso’s style that makes him look quite brilliant when the carisn’t at its best. Not simply content to drive the machine well beyond wheremost had believed its limits lay, Alonso also managed to make it lookdifficult, as if to accentuate quite how good a drive he was putting in.
Ferrari’sproblems run deeper than Alonso made them seem. After he was forced to fend offthe visibly-quicker Williams of Pastor Maldonado in the latter stages of therace, Ferrari can consider themselves fortunate to possess the man who does thebest job of minimising the damage in having a less-than-competitive car.
So despiteButton and Vettel’s role reversal, Alonso’s doggedness proved that some thingshave stayed much as they were a year ago.
Alonso’sFerrari team-mate Felipe Massa had another race to forget, qualifying 16th andeventually retiring after a racing incident.
FortunatelyLewis Hamilton was nowhere to be seen for this particular Massascrap, but despite the Brazilian and his compatriot Bruno Senna refusing toblame one another for the tangle, Massais unlikely to take heart from going out while fighting for 13th spot.
As forHamilton himself, he did a passable impression of the 2011 Lewis, with errorsand bad luck costing him precious points.
The errorcame at the start, allowing Button to dive into the first corner ahead of him –and the bad luck precipitated from there.
Had he beenout in front, it was unthinkable that his first pitstop would have left himstuck behind Sergio Perez. And without that hold-up, Hamilton might have gotten away with hissecond stop coinciding with the arrival of the safety car, allowing Vettel tojump him for second place.
Incidentally,pitting both your drivers on the same lap, as McLaren did on lap 37 with just a10-second gap between them, must rank as Formula One’s equivalent of trying toscore a Panenka-style chipped penalty kick. Mighty impressive when it comesoff, but with an almighty risk of stubbing your toe and looking very silly, asGary Lineker once did, if anything goes wrong.
Hamilton’s miscalculation was marginal,however, and on another day he might well have gone on to win from poleposition. From the outside at least, he seems happier and more focused than hedid last season, and McLaren have provided a car which can contend for thechampionship.
But if Hamilton needed any reminding, Australia showed that dominantmachinery or otherwise, his team-mate could still prove the biggest obstacle tohis title aspirations.
 DRIVER OFTHE RACE: Kimi Raikkonen (Lotus) – There were several strong contenders for thehonour, with Alonso (12th to 5th) and Sergio Perez (22nd to 8th) unlucky tomiss out – but given that this was Raikkonen’s return to Formula One, the awardhas to go to the Finn. Starting 18th and ending up 11 places higher was no meanfeat, and despite errors he showed racing instinct to climb two places on afrantic final lap. To cap it all off, he was great value over the radio. Understatedlydescribed by Lotus team principal Eric Boullier as ‘talkative’ over the courseof the race, the Finn at one point asked why there were blue flags being wavedby the stewards. Have you really been away that long, Kimi?
QUOTE OFTHE WEEKEND: "It's going to be damn hard in Malaysia. It's going to be a lothotter and we have cooling problems already, so it's going to be very hard. Wedon't want to bulls*** ourselves, it's going to be very difficult. With HRT Iwas under a false impression with the new car. I obviously knew there would beproblems but I thought we could get in, and I am very wrong” – What HRT lack insending drivers around the track in their cars on Sunday, they go a small wayto atoning for by the sheer quotability of their driver Narain Karthikeyan.
COMING UP:About half an hour after the racing in Melbourne, the teams were packed up andpreparing for next weekend’s Malaysia Grand Prix. With plenty at stake afterrace one, there’s everything to play for at Sepang. We’ll be building up to therace all week on Eurosport, and bringing you live text commentary from everysession, starting on Friday.


Iveco supplies theScuderia Ferrari with vehicles that transport the Formula 1 Grand Prix cars tothe world championship race tracks. The company is very proud of itspartnership with Ferrari and puts great value on the use of its products by sucha world leading sporting enterprise.
Iveco employs almost 25,000 people and runs 24production units in 11 Countries in the world using excellent technologiesdeveloped in 6 research centres. Besides Europe, the company operates in China, Russia,Australia and Latin America. Around 5,000 sales and service outlets inover 160 Countries guarantee technical support wherever in the world an Ivecovehicle is at work.

Iveco completes delivery of over 200 heavy trucks to the UK MOD

To contact us Click HERE

Iveco Defence Vehicles has completed delivery of its largest ever order in the UK of 206 6x6 and 8x8 Trakkers to support the Royal Engineers on operations. 
 Replacing the existing fleet, the new vehicles have been supplied through two separate procurement routes.  The first of these, for 182 6x6 vehicles, was through the C Vehicle PFI contract run by ALC as prime contractor.  Vehicles were supplied in five variants, with three – the Medium Dump Truck, Self-Loading Dump Truck and Truck-Mounted Loader – being managed by Iveco.  Two other variants – a Drill Rig and a Flush Capping System – were procured under ALC’s direct control.  The second procurement resulted from the success of this 6x6 fleet in service.  The requirement was for a fleet of Protected Self-Loading Dump Trucks for service on operations.  As Iveco had already developed a ballistic steel cab for the Trakker family, the 8x8 Trakker was a natural choice for this demanding role.  The procurement was a direct purchase by the UK MoD, with Iveco managing the complete integration activity.  This required input from five separate sub-contractors – GD (UK), Terex Atlas, Thompson Engineering, BI Engineering and KraussMaffei Wegmann.  A total fleet of 24 Self-Loading Dump Trucks (Protected) are now in service, with the majority of the fleet on operations, where they have been extremely well received.  The protection provided by the steel cab, bar armour and other countermeasures has been particularly welcome.  This completes a series of successes in the field of logistics vehicles by Iveco in recent years, including significant contract wins in France, Switzerland, Germany and Spain.  The company is currently bidding to supply Trakker to the Norwegian and Swedish Armed Forces to re-equip their logistics vehicle fleets.  The Trakker chassis has also been the prime mover of choice for a series of other programmes, including, most recently, the supply of FAUN truck-mounted trackway systems to Turkey.  Trakker was originally designed for heavy commercial applications, such as quarry work, but its reliability, flexibility and durability has made it particularly suitable for adaptation to defence applications.  It is complimented by the Iveco Defence Vehicles High Mobility Range of 4x4, 6x6 and 8x8 specialist military vehicles.  These programmes show how Iveco’s strategy of forming industrial partnerships has allowed the development and delivery of vehicles to support military operations with highly reliable and tailor-made solutions at a competitive price and against tight time constraints.